FY 2007 Fish & Wildlife Program Project Solicitation

Project Proposal Request for FY 2007 - FY 2009 Funding

Proposal 199901500: Big Canyon Fish Habitat

Download this document in MS Word format
Open this document in PDF format

Section 1: General Administrative
Section 2: Project Location
Section 3: Project Species
Section 4: Past Accomplishments
Section 5: Relationship to Other Projects
Section 6: Biological Objectives
Section 7: Work Elements
Section 8: Budget
Section 9: Project Future
Section 10: Documents

Part 2. Reviews

Part 1 of 2. Administration and Budgeting

Section 1: General Administrative Information

Process Information:

Date Proposal Submitted & Finalized	Status	Form Generator
January 10, 2006	Finalized	Lynn Rasmussen

Proposal Type:

Ongoing

Proposal Number:

199901500

Proposal Name:

Big Canyon Fish Habitat

BPA Project Manager:

David Kaplowe

Agency, Institution or Organization:

Nez Perce Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD)

Short Description:

Proposal funds installation of BMPs to address agricultural and forestry related habitat degradations.

Information Transfer:

Information will be transferred to others through StreamNet, CDC, and BPA web site.

Project Proposal Contacts

Contact	Organization	Address	Phone/Email	Roles
Form Submitter
Lynn Rasmussen	Nez Perce Soil and Water Conservation District	P.O. Box 131 Culdesac, Idaho 83524	Ph: 208-843-2931 Fax: 208-843-2931 Email: honora@turbonet.com	Form Submitter
All Assigned Contacts
Lynn Rasmussen	Nez Perce Soil and Water Conservation District	P.O. Box 131 Culdesac, Idaho 83524	Ph: 208-843-2931 Fax: 208-843-2931 Email: honora@turbonet.com	Form Submitter

Section 2: Project Location

Sponsor Province:

Mountain Snake

ARG Province:

No Change

Sponsor Subbasin:

Clearwater

ARG Subbasin:

No Change

Location(s) at which the action will be implemented

Latitude	Longitude	Waterbody	Location Description	County/State	Subbasin	Primary?
46.4554	-116.4102	Big Canyon Creek	Big Canyon Creek watershed. Location represents approximate center of watershed.	Nez Perce, Idaho	Clearwater	Yes

Section 3: Focal Species

Focal Species:

Primary	Secondary	Additional Species
Steelhead Snake River ESU	Chinook Snake River Fall ESU

Section 4: Past Accomplishments

Past Accomplishments for Each Fiscal Year of This Project

Fiscal Year	Accomplishments
2005	Installed 14 water and sediment control structures, 2000 LF of riparian plantings, 0.42 acres of trees, and one pond restoration. Designs completed for and additional 8 projects.
2004	Installed 18 water and sediment control structures, 4 yellow starthistle biocontrol releases, 6 erosion control projects, 2 grassed waterways, two alternative water systems for livestock, 2000 acres of no-till, and 4 grass seedings.
2003	Installed 15 water and sediment control structures, 1,500 LF of grassed waterway, 6 alternative watering systems for livestock, 2 pond restorations, 5,000 LF of fence, 3,000 lf of riparian plantings, and collected stream temperature at 6 sites.
2002	Installed 12 water and sediment control structures, 2,000 LF of grassed waterway, 2 alternative watering systems for livestock, and collected stream temperature at 6 sites.
2001	Conducted public information meetings, installed BMPs, monitored BMP effectiveness, collected stream temperature data, and conducted field inventories.
2000	Developed program project manual, forms, applications; accepted and ranked applications, conducted field inventories, and developed conservation plans.

Section 5: Relationships to Other Projects

Other Current Projects Related to this Project (any funding source)

Funding Source	Related ID	Related Project Title	Relationship
BPA	199608600	Clearwater Focus Program-IDSCC	This project provides coordination on the sub-basin level as well as assists in providing technical and administrative assistance to the District projects.
BPA	199901600	Protect/Restore Big Canyon Cr.	Collects fish habitat and abundance monitoring data, assesses passage barriers, provides technical assistance to the NPSWCD project. Collaberates on tree plantings and fence installations.
Other: Idaho Soil Conservation Commission	WQPA	Big Canyon Water Quality Program for Agriculture Project	Provides cost-share for implementation of BMPs

Section 6: Biological Objectives

Biological Objectives of this Proposed Project

Biological Objective	Full Description	Associated Subbasin Plan	Strategy	Page Nos
Biological Objective Title Description Relevant Su	Maximize social and economic benefits as much as possible while implementing the Clearwater Subbasin Plan.	Clearwater	Strategy 2: Efforts should be made to utilize local labor forces, contractors, and suppliers when implementing habitat improvement projects.	59
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA.	Restore 500 acres of historic wetlands to proper functioning condition by 2017.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Identify areas for restoration. Strategy 2: Prioritize areas for restoration. Strategy 3: Restore historic wetlands. Strategy 4: Restore existing wetlands. Strategy 5: Monitor and evaluate restoration.	42
Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB.	Protect and restore an additional 300 miles of riparian habitats by 2017.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Identify and prioritize riparian. Strategy 2: Protect and restore riparian habitat. Strategy 3: Protect and restore riparian habitats with CCRP. Strategy 4: Increase stewardship. Strategy 6: Monitor and evaluate restoration efforts.	42
Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z.	Protect all currently functioning wetlands.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: assess wetland functionality Strategy 2: Protect wetland habitats with BMPs. Stategy 4: Monitor and evaluate efforts.	41
Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC.	Protect the existing quality, quantity and diversity of native plant communities providing habitat to native wildife species by preventing the introduction, reproduction, and spread of noxious weeds and invasive exotic plants into and within the subbasins.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Identify/prioritize weed treatment areas Strategy 3: Use weed free seed. Strategy 4: limit dispersal by vehicles/livestock Strategy 5: Increase public participation Strategy 6: Prevent establishment Strategy 7: Monitor/evaluate protection	44
Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD.	Reduce the extent and density of established noxious weeds.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Prioritize for treatment Strategy 2: Treat weed infestations Strategy 3: Encourage use of biocontrol methods Stragey 4: Monitor and evaluate efforts to reduce weeds	45
Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE.	Reduce the negative impacts of livestock grazing on the fish, wildlife and plant populations in the subbasin. Focus efforts on riparian and wet meadow habitats.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Identify/prioritize areas impacted by grazing. Strategy 2: Reduce grazing impacts Strategy 3: Reduce confined animal feeding operations. Strategy 4: Monitor and evaluate efforts.	46
Environmental Problem 12, Objective FF.	Reduce conflicts between livestock and native wildlife and plant populations.	Clearwater	Strategy 2: Protect important plant populations - develop grazing management plans to limit adverse impacts to rare or culturally important plant populations. Strategy 3: Prevent seed dispersal by livestock.	46
Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ.	Reduce the impact of the transportation system on wildife and fish populations and habitats.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Plan restoration--conduct a transportation system analysis on the roads system of the Clearwater Subbasin. Strategy 2:- Reduce road impacts Strategy 4: Monitor and evaluate efforts to reduce the impact of roads on fish and wildlife populaions.	50
Environmental Problem 2, Objective B.	Anadromous fish production is limited by habitat quality, quantity and connectivity in portions of the subbasin.	Clearwater	Strategy 1. Identify and prioritize primary limiting factors. Strategy 2. Evaluate habitat treatments. Strategy 5. Implement projects. Strategy 7. Monitor and evaluate habitat improvement projects.	18
Environmental Problem 7, Objective O.	Complete adequate flow designations for all anadromous fish bearing waterways by 2010.	Clearwater	Strategy 3: Prioritize problems and activities. Strategy 4: Restore adequate flows. Strategy 7: Monitor and evaluate restoration efforts.	31
Environmental Problem 7, Objective P.	Reduce number of artificially blocked streams by 2017.	Clearwater	Strategy 3: Remove or modify human-caused barriers. Strategy 5: Monitor and evaluate biological response.	32
Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q.	Reduce water temperatures to levels meeting applicable water quality standards for life stage specific needs of anadromous and native resident fish, with an established upward trend in the number of stream miles meeting standards by 2017.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Identify and prioritize need. Strategy 2: Restore hydrologic functions. Strategy 3: Restore riparian functions. Strategy 5: Identify additional problems. Strategy 6: Monitor and evaluate the results	33
Environmental Problem 7, Objective S.	Reduce instream sedimentation to levels meeting applicable water quality standards and measures, with an established upward trend in the number of stream miles meeting such criterion by 2017.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Identify problems/opportunities. Strategy 3: Prioritize areas. Strategy 4: Reduce sediment by installing BMPs. Strategy 5: Monitor and evaluate efforts.	35
Environmental Problem 7, Objective U.	Improve aquatic habitat diversity and complexity to levels consistent with other objectives outlined in this document, with particular emphasis on recovery of anadromous and fluvial stocks.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Identify the need Strategy 2: Follow existing plans Strategy 3: Prioritize actions Strategy 4: Restore complexity Strategy 5: Restore ecosystem functions. Strategy 7: Monitor and evaluate efforts.	37
Environmental Problem 8, Objective V.	Protect remaining native prairie remnants.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Collect and map data - inventory and map existing prairie grassland remnants	38
Environmental Problem 8, Objective W.	Restore 2000 acres of historic native prairie grassland habitat to natural conditions by 2017.	Clearwater	Strategy 2: Identify and prioritize areas for prairie restoration Strategy 3: Restore prairie habitats. Strategy 5: Monitor and evaluate efforts.	38
Environmental Problem 9, Objective X.	Protect mature ponderosa pine habitats.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: inventory and map ponderosa pine habitats. Strategy 2: prioritize protection areas. Strategy 6: Monitor and evaluate efforts.	39
Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y.	Encourage the development of 150,000 acres of additional ponderosa poine communities.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Identify and prioritize areas to develop into ponderosa pine communities. Strategy 3: Restore ponderosa pine communities. Strategy 4: Monitor and evaluate efforts.	40
Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL.	Develop programs and project proposals compatible with existing community needs and that integrate with local watershed protection, restoration and management objectives and activities.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Involve communities and finer scale efforts in subbasin planning and in program and project planning. Strategy 2: Coordinate plan implementation and avoid program and project duplication.	52
Socioeconomic Problem 19, Objective MM	Identify high priority habitat areas requiring protection or restoration.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Develop a prioritization process to achieve multiple objectives, values, and benefits.	52
Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective PP.	Participate in existing, and contribute to the further development of, local watershed and technical advisory groups.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Assist SWCDs, Watershed Advisory Groups, and other existing groups to organize project goals and implementation strategies Strategy 2: Assist groups. Strategy 3: Facilitate networking of these groups with technical assistance	58
Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.	Increase resource information and education delivery in the subbasin.	Clearwater	Strategy 1: Promote a ridgetop-to-ridgetop stewardship of natural resources Strategy 2: Implement information/education actions Strategy 3: Provide information and assistance Strategy 4: Provide opportunities for subbasin-wide information distribution	59
Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M	Increase understanding of the composition, population trends, and habitat requirements of the terrestrial communities of the Clearwater.	Clearwater	Strategy 2: Increase documentation - support the efforts of Idaho Conservation Data Center to document the occurrence of rare species and work toward increased reporting of sightings	29

Section 7: Work Elements

Work Elements and Associated Biological Objectives

Work Element Name	Work Element Title	Description	Start Date	End Date	Estimated Budget
01a: Manage and Administer Projects	Manage and Administer Project	Coordinate and communicate project administration, planning, technical, reporting, and implementation activities with BPA, regional partners, and regulatory agencies to ensure project goals, objectives, and expections are being met and to comply with environmental regulations. Includes meeting attendance, preparing statements of work, seeking funding, managing budgets, completing reports, and responding to BPA requests.	3/1/2007	2/28/2010	$29,344
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL. Socioeconomic Problem 19, Objective MM Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective PP. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.			No Metrics for this Work Element

01b: Coordination	Coordinate project implementation to reduce duplication and improve project delivery.	Project coordination includes coordination with federal, state, tribal, local and other interests to avoid program and project duplication. Activities under this work element include one interagency watershed meeting per year to coordinate projects, disseminate information and identify joint projects. In addition, project coordination includes working with NRCS and IDFG to coordinate implementation of projects for fish habitat improvement using the EQIP, CCRP, WHIP, PL566, and HIP programs. The local communities of Peck and Craigmont as well as rural residents in Nez Perce and Lewis Counties will be involved in the planning and implementation for specific sites installed through this project proposal. This will be accomplished through public meetings.	3/1/2007	2/28/2010	$29,344
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL. Socioeconomic Problem 19, Objective MM Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective PP. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.			No Metrics for this Work Element

01c: Provide Technical Review	Provide technical assistance to agencies within the watershed in order to share technical expertise and reduce project costs.	Technical assistance provided to NPT, IDFG, NCRS, SCC, NPC for designs, site inventory, and development of recommendations for projects occurring within the watershed and impacting fish habitat.	3/1/2007	2/28/2010	$16,344
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL. Socioeconomic Problem 19, Objective MM Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective PP. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.			No Metrics for this Work Element

01d: Create/Manage/Maintain Database	Develop project database to facilitate information sharing and improve efficiency in BPA metrics reporting.	Develop and update database and GIS layers to track project installation location and project specific information over time. This database will be developed in coodination with the Nez Perce Tribe and shared with other agencies as well as BPA annual reporting. The current database was originally organized in 2003 and includes previous project data from 1999-2005.	3/1/2007	2/28/2010	$15,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL. Socioeconomic Problem 19, Objective MM Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective PP. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.			No Metrics for this Work Element

01e: Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation	Complete environmental compliance documentation.	Produce environmental compliance documentation for review and approval for all on-the-ground implementation projects and actions. NEPA will occur through BPAs, NEPA process checklist, and ESA compliance through BPAs HIP BiOp process. Cultural resource compliance shall be through SHIPO.	3/1/2007	2/28/2010	$18,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL. Socioeconomic Problem 19, Objective MM Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective PP. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.			No Metrics for this Work Element

02a: Analyze/Interpret Data	Identify historic wetland areas.	Using the Lewis-Nez Perce Soil Survey database and GIS complete a hydric soil analysis within the watershed. Field evaluation will be completed in a 3 mile radius around the community of Reubens (this area was identified in the Clearwater Subbasin Plan as having a high amount of historic wetlands). This is a collaberative effort with NRCS and the NPT. GIS analysis will be completed by a subcontractor. Field evaluation will be completed by NPSWCD staff.	5/1/2007	12/30/2007	$15,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X.			No Metrics for this Work Element

02b: Produce Inventory or Assessment	Identify potential locations for prairie remnant habitats.	Locate potential prairie remnant sites by using stream inventory data collected within the Big Canyon Creek watershed and by using air photography, historic Farm Service Agency photos, soils, and topographic information. Work will be performed by a subcontractor.	1/5/2008	12/30/2008	$15,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X.			No Metrics for this Work Element

02c: Produce Inventory or Assessment	Identify ponderosa pine communities.	Inventory and map existing mature ponderosa pine communities. Inventory will be completed using existing stream inventory data to identify stands along streams. The upland sites will be identified through GIS analysis using air photography, soil and topographic information. Work will be completed by a subcontractor.	1/5/2008	12/30/2008	$15,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X.			No Metrics for this Work Element

03a: Produce Inventory or Assessment	Collect stream inventory data on 60 miles of Big Canyon Creek	Using protocols established in the 2005 proposal, complete the stream inventory on BIg Canyon Creek. Sixty miles are planned for completion.	5/1/2007	9/1/2008	$86,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

03b: Create/Manage/Maintain Database	Maintain stream inventory database in order to capture data and facilitate analysis.	Maintain the database and associated spatial layer established through the 2002 BPA project # 2002-015-00. This database is used to manage and analyze the stream inventory and assessment data. Data entry components will be completed by the NPSWCD and GIS components by a subcontractor.	12/1/2007	2/28/2009	$18,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Socioeconomic Problem 19, Objective MM Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

03c: Analyze/Interpret Data	Analyze Big Canyon Creek stream inventory data in order to identify fish limiting factors and prioritize treatment needs.	Analyze and interpret data to identify major fish limiting factors an dlist recommended treatment alternatives.	10/1/2007	10/1/2009	$17,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Socioeconomic Problem 19, Objective MM Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

04a: Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data	Stream Temperature Data collection in the Big Canyon Creek Watershed.	Continue to monitor stream water temperature at six sites within the watershed. The sites are selected through a coordinated effort with the Nez Perce Tribe and Idaho Department of Environmental Quality. In addition, collect stream temperature data at 4 sites where stream temperature practices were installed through the 2002-2005 proposal. Onset Hobo temperature dataloggers are used to measure stream water temperatures. The loggers consist of logger, submersible case and chain. The loggers are placed in the stream in March of each year and are retrieved in November of each year.	3/1/2007	11/1/2009	$12,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.			No Metrics for this Work Element

04b: Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data	Evaluate effectiveness of stream temperature reduction practices.	Collect stream temperature data at four sites where riparian vegetation was planted for the purpose of reducing stream temperatures. HOBO temperature loggers will be deployed at upstream and downstream ends of projects. Deployment, data collection, quality assurance, and data management will follow Idaho DEQ protocols. Loggers are placed in March and collected in November of each year. Work will be completed by NPSWCD.	3/1/2007	11/1/2009	$12,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.			No Metrics for this Work Element

05a: Identify and Select Projects	Identify and select projects for restoration plan development, site specific inventories, and project designs.	Applications are accepted throughout the year and prioritized twice per year. The District newsletter is used to advertise the application periods. Visit potential project sites and collect inventory data for high priority project applications. In general when an inventory is completed the planner will have collected information on the existing vegetation type and condition, soil resource concerns, water quality issues, fish habitat limitations and potentials of the site. Rank project applications received for installation. Projects will be ranked based on fish habitat improvement potentials.	5/1/2007	7/1/2009	$40,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 12, Objective FF. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

05b: Produce Plan	Develop habitat restoration plans.	The highest ranking projects identified through the Identity and Select Work Element are forwarded for plan development. Plans are developed which provide alternative treatments for solving identified fish habitat related resource concerns. Develop land management, habitat restoration and conservation plan which identified site specific practices to address fish habitat needs. This process involves an on-site resource inventory of existing natural resources, identification of resource problems (focusing on fish habitat), development of alternatives to improve the identified problem, and the selection of an alternative and list of habitat improvement practices. Habitat plans are developed by NPSWCD staff and interdisciplinary team of resource professionals from the Nez Perce Tribe - Fisheries Watershed Division and Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Depending upon the site specific problem additional resource assessment and planning assistance is obtained from the Idaho Department of Agriculture, Idaho Soil Conservation Commission, and USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. As part of the habitat plan development process, document the occurrence of rare species and report to the Conservation Data Center (CDC). The goal is to complete 4 habitat plans per year.	3/1/2007	2/28/2010	$70,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 12, Objective FF. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

05c: Produce Design and/or Specifications	Complete designs identified in habitat restoration plans.	Designs are prepared for projects identified in the habitat improvement plans developed under the produce plan work element. Complete surveys to obtain site specific data for the completion of engineering and technical designs. This work includes, but is not limited to, cross-sections, benchmark elevation determination, topographic and photometric surveys. Design package includes surveys, engineering or technical drawings, site maps, construction or installation specifications and material specifications, and cost-estimates. Site locations for designs are determined from the annual prioritization of projects submitted by landowners. A list of projects is developed each fall and then designs are prepared for the highest priority projects. Designs are completed through a coordinated team of professionals including Nez Perce Tribe, Nez Perce County, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Idaho Department of Agriculture, and subcontractors.	3/1/2007	2/28/2010	$80,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 12, Objective FF. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective V. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

06a: Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results	Disseminate data to StreamNet, CDC, and BPA.	Provide relevant fish and habitat data collected through this project for inclusion in the StreamNet database. In addition provide documentation of rare species occurrence identified during the habitat plan development process to the CDC.	1/1/2007	12/1/2009	$8,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

06b: Produce Inventory or Assessment	Nutrient Input Report	Compile nutrient input information collected from the stream inventory and conservation plan process and develop a report. The stream inventory and conservation plan process inventories and maps potential anthropogenic nutrient inputs from sources such as livestock feedlots, septic systems and other non-point sources. The report lists nutrient input sources and will be disseminated to other watershed stakeholders.	11/1/2009	12/1/2009	$8,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

07a: Develop Alternative Water Source	Develop alternative livestock water sources.	Install alternative water developments in areas identified through the stream inventory and conservation planning process. Where livestock water directly from stream sources or springs, alternative water sources will be developed. These water sources include wind, solar and gravity fed systems. Typical components of a water system include a trough,collector and pipeline. Target is to construct 3 off-site watering facilities per year in 2007, 2008, and 2009.	6/1/2007	10/1/2009	$45,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

07b: Install Fence	Install Fence to Protect Wetlands/Riparian Areas	Install fence in areas identified through the stream inventory and conservation planning process. Work items include obtaining materials identified in fence designs and installation. Fence will be installed by landowners or by the Nez Perce Tribe Fence Crew. Target is to construct 1 miles of fence per year in 2007, 2008, and 2009.	5/1/2007	11/1/2009	$38,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			* # of miles of fence: 3

07c: Upland Erosion and Sedimentation Control	Install Erosion Control Practices	Install erosion control measures such as grassed waterways, terraces, grade control structures, sediment basins, diversions, water and sediment control structures and buffers as recommended through the stream inventory process and habitat plan development on specific land owner properties. The target is to install 8 practices per year in 2007, 2008, and 2009.	5/1/2007	11/1/2009	$86,700
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

07d: Create, Restore, and/or Enhance Wetland	Restore and enhance wetlands	Implement wetland restoration and enhance measures as recommended through the stream inventory and habitat planning process. The target is to restore and/or enhance 0.5 acres of wetland per year in 2007, 2008, and 2009.	5/1/2007	11/1/2009	$45,600
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

07e: Improve/Relocate Road	Improve forestry, agriculture, and rangeland access roads	Road improvements consist of upgrading cross-sections and ditch, addition of base and surface aggregates, and upgrading inadequate cross-drains to reduce sediment delivery to the stream. Work inspection will occur during installation to ensure design parameters and material specifications are followed. Target is to improve 1 mile of road per year.	5/1/2007	11/1/2009	$80,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

07f: Increase Instream Habitat Complexity	Restore instream habitat complexity within the Big Canyon Creek Watershed.	Restore instream habitat complexity through the installation of LWD in areas recommended by the stream inventory. However, completion of inventory in 2007 may reprioritize locations. Target is to increase habitat complexity in 1 miles of stream in 2007, 2009, and 2009.	5/1/2007	11/28/2009	$48,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

07g: Remove vegetation	Control weeds to assist in establishment of riparian vegetation.	Implement invasive weed treatment prior to planting vegetation. Weed control will be performed using mechanical and chemical control methods to assist in the establishment of riparian vegetation. The control of weed competition is critical in the first two to three years after a riparian planting. Mechanical weed control is performed with weed eaters and mowers. Chemical weed control is performed using hand sprayers with herbicide application occurring in spot treatment areas. Weed control will be performed in late spring and early fall depending upon weed growth during the year. Work will be completed by NPSWCD staff, Idaho department of Correction Inmate Labor, and subcontractors. Target is to treat 8 acres per year in 2007, 2008, and 2009. This work element is directly related to the plant vegetation work element below.	4/1/2007	10/28/2009	$42,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

07h: Plant Vegetation	Plant riparian and upland grass plantings to reduce sediment delivery, improve base flows, increase stream shading and improve habitat complexity.	Plant vegetation to reduce sediment delivery to Big Canyon Creek, restore base flows, increase stream shading and improve habitat diversity and complexity. Locations are determined from recommendations in the stream inventory and habitat planning processes. Native species will be used where appropriate and feasible. All seed used will be certified weed free seed. Target is to plant 7 acres of riparian plantings and 20 acres of upland plantings per year in 2007, 2008, and 2009.	4/1/2007	10/28/2009	$47,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y. Terrestrial Species Problem 6, Objective M			No Metrics for this Work Element

08a: Remove/Modify Dam	Maintain connectivity within the Big Canyon Creek watershed in low flow months	Install 2 low flow crossing barrier improvements. A different technique will be used at each site to demonstrate to land owners and users alternatives for low flow condition stream crossings. Stream inventory data collected in the 2002-2005 proposal identified fish passage barriers during low flow summer months. These barriers typically occur where the stream is used for agricultural equipment crossings. The need for low cost, low maintenance alternatives was identifed. Crossing types will be identified in the 2006 Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat Proposal. These alternatives will be applied through this proposal and used as demonstration sites to assist in land owner/manager adoption.	5/1/2007	11/28/2008	$51,020
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 7, Objective P.			No Metrics for this Work Element

08b: Install Fish Passage Structure	Restore connectivity	Replace barrier culverts with fish friendly structures as recommended and prioritized by IDT team and stream inventory. Implementation items will include advertisement for bid, site inspection, final inspection, and implementation monitoring. Target is to replace 1 structure per year 2007, 2008, and 2009.	5/1/2007	11/28/2009	$55,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 7, Objective P.			No Metrics for this Work Element

09a: Outreach and Education	Inform public about fish habitat needs within the watershed	Provide project specific and general fish habitat information to the public through the District newsletter, radio announcements, local papers, and educational presentations.	2/1/2007	10/28/2009	$18,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Socioeconomic Problem 18. Objective LL. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective PP. Socioeconomic Problem 21, Objective RR.			No Metrics for this Work Element

10a: Maintain Vegetation	Maintain riparian vegetation.	Previously planted vegetation will be maintained by an annual site review to monitor establishment and determine if weed control is needed. If weed control is needed, then weed control will be performed. Weed control methods include mechanical (mowing) and herbicide (spot spraying). The NPSWCD contracts with the landowners to maintain the vegetation after the establishment period. Costs associated with vegetation maintenance after year 3 of the planting are the responsibility of the landowner. Landowner maintenance costs are shown as cost share in the budget portion.	3/1/2007	10/28/2009	$15,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective P. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y.			No Metrics for this Work Element

10b: Operate and Maintain Habitat/Passage	Maintain Previous Years Fence Construction	Maintain previously constructed fence. Maintenance is required to ensure a properly functioning fence that protects riparian and stream habitat. Target is to maintain approximately 3 miles of fence per year.	3/1/2007	10/28/2009	$15,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective P. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y.			No Metrics for this Work Element

10c: Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data	Project compliance and Implementation Monitoring	Post project monitoring to ensure project specifications were completed. Set up and collect data to evaluate restoration projects to ensure desired outcomes are met. Data collection may include photo points, vegetation plots, cross-sections and post year site inspections.	9/1/2007	11/28/2009	$12,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective P. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y.			No Metrics for this Work Element

10d: Analyze/Interpret Data	Analyze Project Compliance and Implementation Monitoring Data.	Analyze project compliance and implementation monitoring data to ensure projects are meeting desired outcomes. Additional work and lessons learned will be incorporated into conservation plans.	12/1/2007	2/28/2009	$15,000
Biological Objectives			Metrics
Environmental Problem 10, Objective AA. Environmental Problem 10, Objective BB. Environmental Problem 10, Objective Z. Environmental Problem 11, Objective CC. Environmental Problem 11, Objective DD. Environmental Problem 12, Objective EE. Environmental Problem 16, Objective JJ. Environmental Problem 2, Objective B. Environmental Problem 7, Objective O. Environmental Problem 7, Objective P. Environmental Problem 7, Objective Q. Environmental Problem 7, Objective S. Environmental Problem 7, Objective U. Environmental Problem 8, Objective W. Environmental Problem 9, Objective X. Environmental Problem 9, Objective Y.			No Metrics for this Work Element

Section 8: Budget

Itemized Estimated Budget

Item	Note	FY 2007 Cost	FY 2008 Cost	FY 2009 Cost
Personnel	project leader, field technicians, planner, biologist	$161,133	$161,133	$161,133
Travel	[blank]	$2,421	$2,421	$2,421
Overhead	Training	$1,000	$1,000	$1,000
Overhead	telephone	$3,960	$3,960	$3,960
Supplies	[blank]	$4,800	$4,800	$4,800
Other	materials for bmp installation	$42,371	$40,910	$39,800
Other	repairs and maintenance	$750	$750	$750
Other	vehicle lease, pov mileage	$15,050	$15,050	$15,050
Overhead	computer services	$4,000	$ 0	$ 0
Overhead	12%	$28,258	$27,602	$27,469
Other	office rent	$7,200	$7,200	$7,200
Other	equipment	$1,000	$1,000	$1,000
Other	consultants and contracts	$105,000	$105,000	$105,000
Totals		$376,943	$370,826	$369,583

Total Estimated FY 2007-2009 Budgets

Total Itemized Budget	$1,117,352
Total Work Element budget	$1,117,352

Cost sharing

Funding Source or Organization	Item or Service Provided	FY 2007 Est Value ($)	FY 2008 Est Value ($)	FY 2009 Est Value ($)	Cash or in-kind?	Status
Farm Service Agency	CRP program payments	$34,000	$34,000	$34,000	Cash	Confirmed
Idaho Department of Agriculture	Engineering design assistance	$5,000	$5,000	$5,000	In-Kind	Confirmed
Nez Perce Tribe	technical assistance for planning and designs	$12,000	$12,000	$12,000	In-Kind	Confirmed
WQPA	cost share for BMPs	$10,000	$8,000	$8,000	Cash	Confirmed
Totals		$61,000	$59,000	$59,000

Section 9: Project Future

Project Future Costs and/or Termination

FY 2010 Est Budget	FY 2011 Est Budget	Comments
$300,000	$300,000	[Outyear comment field left blank]
Future Operations & Maintenance Costs
Operation and maintenance of BMPs is the landowners responsibility

Termination Date	Comments
estimated 2020

Final Deliverables

Section 10: Narrative

Document	Type	Size	Date
Narrative for proposal 199901500	doc	5.2 M	1/10/2006

Part 2 of 2. Reviews of Proposal

Administrative Review Group (ARG) Results

Account Type:
Expense

Location:
Province: No Change
Subbasin: No Change

Primary Focal Species
No Change

ARG Comments:

NPCC Final Funding Recommendations (October 23, 2006) [Full NPCC Council Recs]

FY 2007 Budget
$ 0

FY 2008 Budget
$ 0

FY 2009 Budget
$ 0

Total NPCC Rec
$ 0

Budget Type:

Expense

Budget Category:

ProvinceExpense

Recommendation:

Do Not Fund

Comments:

NPCC Draft Funding Recommendations (September 15, 2006) [Full NPCC Council Recs]

FY 2007 Budget
$ 0

FY 2008 Budget
$ 0

FY 2009 Budget
$ 0

Total NPCC Rec
$ 0

FY 2007 MSRT Rec
$ 0

FY 2008 MSRT Rec
$ 0

FY 2009 MSRT Rec
$ 0

Total MSRT Rec
$ 0

Budget Category:

ProvinceExpense

Comments:

Local or MSRT Comments: State Tier 2

Independent Scientific Review Panel Final Review (August 31, 2006) [Download full document]

Recommendation: Not fundable

NPCC Comments: The revised narrative and response to the ISRP questions from the preliminary project review are insufficient to form the basis for the ISRP to find that this proposal has sufficiently defined objectives (biological or physical habitat) that are to be accomplished within a specified period and are measurable for assessment and evaluation. There is insufficient information provided for the ISRP to find that continuing to implement this proposal is likely to benefit the focal species.

Past surveys and environmental and watershed assessments are cited as justification for this creek to support steelhead and reintroduced coho salmon. However, there is little quantitative support for the very general statements made. For example, reporting that Fuller et al. (1986) determined that the Big Canyon Creek was one the top steelhead producing streams on the Nez Perce reservation and that Kucera et al. (1983) concluded that of the 23 streams surveyed in the lower Clearwater, Little Canyon and Big Canyon creeks had the highest and 4th highest densities of over yearling steelhead respectively does not inform us of the actual status of the populations, only their status relative to other presumably degraded environments. Further, it tells little about the restoration potential.

It is very likely that installing agricultural Best Management Practices throughout the watershed would improve a number of water quality challenges facing the creek and Clearwater subbasin. The proposal, however, is insufficient for the ISRP to determine whether the actions proposed will actually benefit the focal species. On this basis, the proposal is Not Fundable.

Independent Scientific Review Panel Preliminary Review (June 2, 2006) [Download full document]

Recommendation: Response requested

NPCC Comments: A response is needed regarding three issues: (a) priority and feasibility of restoration, (b) results to date, and (c) watershed assessment.

(a) Why is continuing to expend effort on restoration in the watershed justified? The proposal's technical and scientific background provides a compelling case that there is much habitat degradation in the Big Canyon watershed. What is NOT evident is the extent to which this watershed ever was a major producer of fish (in this case steelhead which are ESA listed, and coho which are being reintroduced). It is not identified in either the Clearwater Subbasin Plan or federal recovery plans as being a focal point of sustainable populations under anticipated landscape conditions, or with the likelihood of recovering sustainable populations by recovering or restoring habitat forming ecological functions in the watershed. For example, "Presence of at-risk-species: wild A-run steelhead" is not enough detail. In response, please provide evidence that this is an essential watershed for the continued persistence of these fish, and some idea that recovery is possible. Please consider both the steelhead and the coho reintroduction.

(b) Results to date need to be reported. How do we know this is working? In response, please summarize the realized benefits to anadromous fish. The first paragraph of the section Rationale and Significance to Subbasin Plans and Regional Programs includes a final sentence with the historic miles of stream restored and sediment reduction left blank. In response, please fill in the numbers.

(c) Some watershed assessments have been completed but the results and implications of these analyses are not adequately summarized in the proposal. The Big Canyon Creek Environmental Assessment (1995) and Big Canyon Creek Watershed Assessment ("expected completion 2001") are identified as related projects. It seems this project should be designed and based on the assessments provided by those efforts. Also, why is Big Canyon Creek Watershed Assessment still listed as expected completion 2001 in 2005/6? Is the assessment completed and released yet? If not, how is it being used to develop the work elements in this proposal? Please provide answers to these questions and expand your summary of the implications of completed watershed assessments.

Maintained by the Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. Please direct comments or questions to the webmaster.

Project Proposal Request for FY 2007 - FY 2009 Funding

Proposal 199901500: Big Canyon Fish Habitat

Table of Contents