FY 2007 Solicitation Homepage
All Proposals Login Summary Report Search Contact Us

Project Proposal Request for FY 2007 - FY 2009 Funding

Proposal 200737300: IDL Priest Lake Fish Passage

Download this document in MS Word format
Open this document in PDF format

Table of Contents
Part 1. Administration and Budgeting
Section 1: General Administrative
Section 2: Project Location
Section 3: Project Species
Section 4: Past Accomplishments
Section 5: Relationship to Other Projects
Section 6: Biological Objectives
Section 7: Work Elements
Section 8: Budget
Section 9: Project Future
Section 10: Documents
Part 2. Reviews
Part 1 of 2. Administration and Budgeting
Section 1: General Administrative Information
Process Information:
Date Proposal Submitted & Finalized Status Form Generator
January 10, 2006 Finalized Pete Van Sickle
Proposal Type: New
Proposal Number: 200737300
Proposal Name: IDL Priest Lake Fish Passage
Agency, Institution or Organization: Idaho Department of Lands
Short Description: This project involves the replacement of fish barrier culverts with fish passable structures. This will make available existing fish habitat.
Information Transfer: Information transfer will include offering project data on-line.
 
Project Proposal Contacts
Contact Organization Address Phone/Email Roles Notes
Form Submitter
Pete Van Sickle Idaho Department of Lands 2780 Industrial Ave.
Coeur d'Alene, ID, 83815		 Ph: 208-666-8618
Fax: 208-769-1524
Email: pvansickle@idl.state.id.us		 Form Submitter The projects listed are all on IDL lands managed for the state endowment trusts.
All Assigned Contacts
Section 2: Project Location
Sponsor Province: Intermountain ARG Province: No Change
Sponsor Subbasin: Pend Oreille ARG Subbasin: No Change
Location(s) at which the action will be implemented
Latitude Longitude Waterbody Location Description County/State Subbasin Primary?
48.27.5 -116.42.40 Race Creek T59N, R3W, Sec. 22 Boundary, Idaho Pend Oreille No
48.27.21 -116.42.60 North Fork of East River T59N, R3W, Sec. 22 Boundary, Idaho Pend Oreille Yes
Section 3: Focal Species
Focal Species:
Primary Secondary Additional Species
Bull Trout
Resident Fish
Section 4: Past Accomplishments
Past Accomplishments for Each Fiscal Year of This Project This proposal is for funding a new project, and has no past accomplishments.
Section 5: Relationships to Other Projects
Other Current Projects Related to this Project (any funding source) There are no projects related to this proposal.
Section 6: Biological Objectives
Biological Objectives of this Proposed Project
Biological Objective Full Description Associated Subbasin Plan Strategy Page Nos
Sub-basin Objective 1B1 Protect and restore instream and riparian habitat tto maintain functional ecosystems for resident fish Intermountain Strategy a: Develop criteria for prioritizing streams and/or stream reaches for native resident and desirable nonnative fishes Strategy c: Develp and prioritize subsasin-wide havitat protection, restoration, and enhancement measures for native residen 18-8
Sub-basin Objective 1B4 Develop, prioritize, and implement projects to remove or reduce sediment sources negatively influencing fish habitat Intermountain Strategy a: Develop criteria for prioritizing streams and/or stream reaches for sediment reduction improvements 18-9
Section 7: Work Elements
Work Elements and Associated Biological Objectives
Work Element Name Work Element Title Description Start Date End Date Estimated Budget
Install Fish Passage Structure Increase available havitat Remove two fish passage blocking culvers and replace with fish passable structures 7/1/2007 10/31/2009 $108,420
Biological Objectives Metrics
* # of miles of habitat accessed: 1.5 miles
* Does the structure remove or replace a fish passage barrier?: Yes
* Was barrier Full or Partial?: Partial
Section 8: Budget
Itemized Estimated Budget
Item Note FY 2007 Cost FY 2008 Cost FY 2009 Cost
Supplies Contract costs including all materials $55,100 $53,320 $ 0
Totals $55,100 $53,320 $ 0
Total Estimated FY 2007-2009 Budgets
Total Itemized Budget$108,420
Total Work Element budget$108,420
Cost sharing
Funding Source or Organization Item or Service Provided FY 2007 Est Value ($) FY 2008 Est Value ($) FY 2009 Est Value ($) Cash or in-kind? Status
IDL Planning, Design, Administration $7,300 $7,300 $ 0 In-Kind Confirmed
Totals $7,300 $7,300 $ 0
Section 9: Project Future
Project Future Costs and/or Termination
FY 2010 Est Budget FY 2011 Est Budget Comments
$1,000 $1,000 On-going operatinal and periodic maintenance of roads and bridges.
Future Operations & Maintenance Costs
These costs are annual inspection of structures and periodic maintenance of structures and approach roads.
 
Termination Date Comments
12/31/2009 Termination of project occurs when stream crossing structures are installed to project specifications and all payments are completed.
 
Final Deliverables
Final deliverables include culverts removed and disposed and replacement bridges installed and site prepared to specifications.
Section 10: Narrative
Document Type Size Date
Narrative for proposal 200737300 doc 154 kb 1/1/2006
Part 2 of 2. Reviews of Proposal
Administrative Review Group (ARG) Results
Account Type:
Expense		 No changes were made to this proposal


BPA's in lieu Funding Review of new project proposals (August 3, 2006) [Download letter and table]
BPA's in lieu Rating: 3.0
Approx. BPA share of total costs: BPA 88%
Status of Cost Share: Confirmed
Notes: Culvert replacements, non-fed lands (IDL authorized/required via forest practices act, Snake River Basin Adjudication to address)


NPCC Final Funding Recommendations (October 23, 2006) [Full NPCC Council Recs]
FY 2007 Budget
$ 0		 FY 2008 Budget
$ 0		 FY 2009 Budget
$ 0		 Total NPCC Rec
$ 0
Budget Type:Expense
Budget Category:ProvinceExpense
Recommendation:Do Not Fund
Comments:


NPCC Draft Funding Recommendations (September 15, 2006) [Full NPCC Council Recs]
FY 2007 Budget
$ 0		 FY 2008 Budget
$ 0		 FY 2009 Budget
$ 0		 Total NPCC Rec
$ 0
FY 2007 MSRT Rec
$ 0		 FY 2008 MSRT Rec
$ 0		 FY 2009 MSRT Rec
$ 0		 Total MSRT Rec
$ 0
Budget Category:ProvinceExpense
Comments:


Independent Scientific Review Panel Final Review (August 31, 2006) [Download full document]
Recommendation: Response requested
NPCC Comments: This project is likely to have major benefit (fish were present, but no numbers provided below the barrier culverts) despite shortcuts taken in proposal writing. Note that throughout the proposal, the wording is mostly (or entirely) similar to that of Proposals 200705600 and 200737300, even in that access to 7 miles of stream will be enabled. Does the latter mean that each of the projects will provide that much access or that the three projects will in total? More specific information is needed in the response about the amount of habitat above the present barrier. Also, a measure of project success should be made after the barrier was eliminated (no M&E is included). A response is needed on monitoring and assessment of the project; e.g., evaluation of whether fish successfully pass or how many fish pass, and how much habitat is upstream waiting to be utilized.


Independent Scientific Review Panel Preliminary Review (June 2, 2006) [Download full document]
Recommendation: Response requested
NPCC Comments: This project is likely to have major benefit (fish were present, but no numbers provided below the barrier culverts) despite shortcuts taken in proposal writing. Note that throughout the proposal, the wording is mostly (or entirely) similar to that of Proposals 200705600 and 200737300, even in that access to 7 miles of stream will be enabled. Does the latter mean that each of the projects will provide that much access or that the three projects will in total? More specific information is needed in the response about the amount of habitat above the present barrier. Also, a measure of project success should be made after the barrier was eliminated (no M&E is included). A response is needed on monitoring and assessment of the project; e.g., evaluation of whether fish successfully pass or how many fish pass, and how much habitat is upstream waiting to be utilized.

Maintained by the Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority. Please direct comments or questions to the webmaster.